« This Is A Cease Fire? | Main | The Return Of Michel Aoun »
In the excitement of the banned Guité testimony coming to light, I missed another significant piece of testimony in the Gomery Inquiry. Serge Gosselin, a Liberal Party pollster, testified that Chrétien crony Jacques Corriveau paid him directly for his work on behalf of the party and had no idea that Corriveau kept the payments off the books:
A federal Liberal pollster and researcher was paid more than $60,000 by a friend of Jean Chretien for partisan activities, including work during the 2000 election campaign, the sponsorship inquiry was told Thursday.Serge Gosselin, one-time aide to unity minister Stephane Dion, said he vetted campaign billboards and other material on behalf of Jacques Corriveau.
Gosselin was told by inquiry counsel Guy Cournoyer there's no evidence Pluri Design, Corriveau's company, ever passed the bill on to the Liberals for the work.
"Are you surprised to find that for services of an essentially political nature for the Quebec wing of the Liberal party, your services were not billed to the party?" asked the lawyer.
Gosselin said: "It's the first time I've seen this and I am completely surprised."
If Gosselin has paid attention to the Adscam hearings up to now, he can't have been too surprised. Corriveau has emerged as a central financing point for the extensive money-laundering and electoral-fraud scheme, collecting wads of cash from contractors like Jean Brault and stuffing the pockets of like-minded Grits or funding Liberal Party activities outside of campaign-finance regulation. Corriveau was well-placed for such a key role; his design firm got $7 million in Sponsorship contracts but did very little of the actual work, if any at all. The dual influence of being a prime contractor and a close friend of the Prime Minister allowed Corriveau to twist arms for generous 'contributions' from people like Jean Brault.
In proximity to Guité's testimony, Gosselin almost appears as a footnote, but don't be fooled. He substantiates an important part of the case for electoral fraud. If Corriveau indeed paid off Liberal Party contractors with kickback cash kept off the books, then he and everyone associated with the effort would be guilty of electoral fraud. Gosselin's testimony explicitly shows that Corriveau himself acted as bagman, and without any related entry on Liberal Party budgets, that crime becomes crystal clear.
Sphere It View blog reactionsTrackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Corriveau Spread The Wealth (Off The Books, Natch):
» Analysis of the new poll from Stephen Taylor - Conservative Party of Canada Pundit
The latest Ipsos Reid poll was released today at 6am for public consumption. The poll shows the Liberals and the Conservatives in a virtual tie... [Read More]
Tracked on May 7, 2005 3:46 PM
captain*at*captainsquartersblog.com
My Other Blog!
E-Mail/Comment/Trackback Policy
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Hugh Hewitt
Captain's Quarters
Fraters Libertas
Lileks
Power Line
SCSU Scholars
Shot In The Dark
Northern Alliance Radio Network
Northern Alliance Live Streaming!
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
Drudge Report
Reason
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Washington Post
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
OpinionJournal
Pioneer Press
Minneapolis Star-Tribune
MS-NBC
Fox News
CNN
Design & Skinning by:
m2 web studios
blog advertising
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?