« Kurtz: Did Watergate Spoil Journalism? | Main | Liberal MP Leaves, Martin Back At Square One »
The Supreme Court dealt a body blow to medical marijuana advocates this morning by ruling that the federal ban on consumption trumps more liberal laws approved by individual states:
Federal authorities may prosecute sick people who smoke pot on doctors’ orders, the Supreme Court ruled Monday, concluding that state medical marijuana laws don’t protect users from a federal ban on the drug.The decision is a stinging defeat for marijuana advocates who had successfully pushed 10 states to allow the drug’s use to treat various illnesses.
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing the 6-3 decision, said that Congress could change the law to allow medical use of marijuana.
In this case, Stevens argues for judicial restraint and conservatism. The court could easily have declared for state's rights and invalidated the ban enacted by Congress and its agency, the FDA. Instead, he avoided the entire issue of the merits or lack thereof of the medicinal value of weed -- the proper position for the Supreme Court to take.
On the other hand, Sandra Day O'Connor led the trio of opposing judges arguing that states' rights allows for such legislation to supercede federal authority. She also argued that the law overreaches in its authority to keep people from growing their own marijuana in their own homes for their own purposes:
O'Connor said she would have opposed California's medical marijuana law if she was a voter or a legislator. But she said the court was overreaching to endorse "making it a federal crime to grow small amounts of marijuana in one's own home for one's own medicinal use."
However, O'Connor has to then ignore that Congress gave the authority for determining safety, efficacy, and propriety of pharmaceuticals to the FDA, in part to protect American consumers from the quackery of the 19th and early 20th centuries. That amounts to a compelling state interest, and Congress has the right and responsibility to act in that regard. To have SCOTUS strip that authority from Congress would have amounted to judicial activism, this time ironically from the right.
None of this actually decides whether marijuana in its smoked form has medicinal value to the chronically nauseated from chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Perhaps now that its authority has been reaffirmed, Congress will authorize a full and independent study of that question in order to settle the question once and for all.
UPDATE: Come visit my comments, where a couple of people are seriously harshing my mellow -- by pounding me (politely) over my reaction. It's painful but compelling. XRLQ and Brant from SWLiP argue for the prosecution, while I represent myself ... to predictable results.
Sphere It View blog reactionsTrackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SCOTUS Harshes Everyone's Mellow:
» Supreme Court Rules on Medical Marijuana from The American Mind
Drug legalization isn't one of the big issues for me, but I do find today's Supreme Court decision on medical... [Read More]
Tracked on June 6, 2005 10:18 AM
» Federal Mairjuana Laws Stand from Secure Liberty
In a decision that is hardly suprising, the Supreme Court ruled today that federal laws making marijuana use illegal still apply even when state law permits medical or other use. (H/T Wizbang) The Supreme Court ruled today that the federal government h... [Read More]
Tracked on June 6, 2005 11:16 AM
» Supremes just say no to smoking doobie from The Unalienable Right
The Supreme Court ruled today in Gonzalez v. Raich that federal law banning marijuana trumps state laws that allow medicinal use of the drug. Ed at Captain's Quarters presents a defense of the majority Supreme Court ruling here:
However, O'Connor has ... [Read More]
Tracked on June 6, 2005 3:29 PM
» Today’s Medical Marijuana Ruling IS A Lose/Lose Proposition from SoCalPundit
Because it proves that judges regularly create law that runs counter to the state and federal constitution and the will of the people of California who voted to make the laws a reality.
My regular readers already know I am for the decriminalization o... [Read More]
Tracked on June 6, 2005 4:19 PM
» Around the Blogosphere from JackLewis.net
Anti-Christian zealots and the Air Force Academy Michelle Malkin Downing Street Memo Michelle Malkin, WizBang, Blogs for Bush Pie Thrower... [Read More]
Tracked on June 7, 2005 7:46 AM
captain*at*captainsquartersblog.com
My Other Blog!
E-Mail/Comment/Trackback Policy
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Hugh Hewitt
Captain's Quarters
Fraters Libertas
Lileks
Power Line
SCSU Scholars
Shot In The Dark
Northern Alliance Radio Network
Northern Alliance Live Streaming!
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
Drudge Report
Reason
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Washington Post
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
OpinionJournal
Pioneer Press
Minneapolis Star-Tribune
MS-NBC
Fox News
CNN
Design & Skinning by:
m2 web studios
blog advertising
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?