In a development that really plumbs the depth of hypocrisy, the American Civil Liberties Union now wants to impose speech codes on its own board while decrying restrictions on free speech everywhere else. Under new guidelines that the ACLU has taken under serious consideration, directors will be urged to make happy or keep their mouths shut:

The American Civil Liberties Union is weighing new standards that would discourage its board members from publicly criticizing the organization's policies and internal administration.

"Where an individual director disagrees with a board position on matters of civil liberties policy, the director should refrain from publicly highlighting the fact of such disagreement," the committee that compiled the standards wrote in its proposals.

"Directors should remember that there is always a material prospect that public airing of the disagreement will affect the A.C.L.U. adversely in terms of public support and fund-raising," the proposals state.

This comes from the organization that would file a blizzard of lawsuits if any other corporation attempted to enact such a policy. Can anyone imagine the ACLU defending a similar policy at Enron, Global Crossings, or the NSA? Perhaps they would. Susan Herman, a current ACLU board member and a Brooklyn Law School professor, justifies the speech code based on the "fiduciary responsibilities" of the board. Using that logic, any corporation can take action against dissenters and whistleblowers on the basis that their statements might hurt stock prices.

ACLU flacks claim that this entails no punitive measures, but their members aren't buying that explanation. Nat Hentoff, the respected Village Voice reporter and a longtime ACLU member, wondered if Dick Cheney had drawn up the guidelines himself. He also referred to the "guidelines" as nothing more than a gag order intended to suppress dissent. Former ACLU board member Muriel Morisey told the New York Times that the policy constructs a framework for punitive action. After all, if board members do not adhere to these guidelines, at some point action has to be taken or the guidelines themselves are meaningless.

Even if no action is taken, the new instructions make a statement about the organization. The ACLU says by its consideration of this proposal that it cannot withstand dissent, an odd position for an organization that based its existence to protect dissent elsewhere. They seem to say that some dissent is tolerable and others are not, and that the highest authorities hold the privilege of deciding which is which. It's interesting and terribly convenient that they would only apply that philosophy to themselves.

UPDATE: The New York Sun blog, It Shines for All, weighs in with another example of hypocrisy from the New York chapter of the ACLU in 2005:

Hypocrisy is on show in a Manhattan courtroom today. The New York Civil Liberties Union will argue for the second day before Judge Richard Berman that the city's subway bag search policy is an "unjustifiable erosion of the privacy rights of the American public." Yet take a walk into the NYCLU's Manhattan headquarters - which it shares with other organizations - and you'll find a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search.

If you haven't yet checked out ISFA, do so now and tell Daniel Freedman that CQ says hello. It's one of the best media-based blogs and underscores The Sun's commitment to the blogosphere.

UPDATE II: The Influence Peddler waxes nostalgic for 1994.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry is

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ACLU: Now We Like Speech Codes:

» Civil Liberty Frauds from It Shines For All
"In a development that really plumbs the depth of hypocrisy, the American Civil Liberties Union now wants to impose speech codes on its own board while decrying restrictions on free speech everywhere else," Captains Quarters writes.This comes from the ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 7:39 AM

» Civil Liberty Frauds from It Shines For All
"In a development that really plumbs the depth of hypocrisy, the American Civil Liberties Union now wants to impose speech codes on its own board while decrying restrictions on free speech everywhere else," Captains Quarters writes.This comes from the ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 8:43 AM

» Civil Liberty Frauds from It Shines For All
"In a development that really plumbs the depth of hypocrisy, the American Civil Liberties Union now wants to impose speech codes on its own board while decrying restrictions on free speech everywhere else," Captains Quarters writes.This comes from the ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 8:49 AM

» It Shines for All - the Blog of the New York Sun from QT Monster's Place
This morning I was happy today to discover that the New York Sun newspaper has a blog, It Shines for All. The New York Sun leans center right politically and includes among its columnists, Jim Geraghty of the National Review blog, TKS. I know I'll make... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 9:30 AM

» A.C.L.U. May Block Criticism by Its Board from Stop The ACLU
This is the kind of hypocrisy that Conservatives and most reasonable liberals can agree that the ACLU needs to some house cleaning on. Via NY Times…. The American Civil Liberties Union is weighing new standards that would discourage its board ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 9:45 AM

» The Liberal Thought As We Know It from All Things Beautiful
So now keeping English as a unified language is racist. It seems like this verbal disease is spreading through the Democratic party, down from the very highest ranks, who have proven constitutionally incapable of reining in their superciliousness, and ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 10:18 AM

» ACLU, That Bastion Of Free Speech from The Sandbox
Oh, the ACLU. I don't like throwing the term hypocrisy around loosely, but in some cases it's warranted (h/t: Stop the ACLU):The American Civil Liberties Union is weighing new standards that would discourage its board members from publicly criticizing the [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 11:23 AM

» ACLU, That Bastion Of Free Speech from The Sandbox
Oh, the ACLU. I don't like throwing the term hypocrisy around loosely, but in some cases it's warranted (h/t: Stop the ACLU):The American Civil Liberties Union is weighing new standards that would discourage its board members from publicly criticizing the [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 11:24 AM

» A.C.L.U. May Block Criticism by Its Board from Random Thoughts Of Yet Another Military Member
... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 12:19 PM

» A.C.L.U. May Block Criticism by Its Board from Random Thoughts Of Yet Another Military Member
... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 12:19 PM

» "A.C.L.U. May Block Criticism by Its Board" from protein wisdom

From the New York Times:The American Civil Liberties Union is weighing new standards that would discourage its board members from publicly criticizing the organization's policies and internal administration. "Where an individual director d...

Tracked on May 24, 2006 4:14 PM

» Dissent Must Be Stifled from Blue Crab Boulevard
In a nightmarish, Rovian plot to suppress free speech, dissent must be crushed. The board members must never speak of disagreements. Nobody must know what goes on in the secret meetings. A cloak of darkness must be drawn tight over the p... [Read More]

Tracked on May 24, 2006 8:01 PM

» Stop the ACLU from Right Truth
This is the kind of hypocrisy that Conservatives and most reasonable liberals can agree that the ACLU needs to some house cleaning on. Via NY Times.... The American Civil Liberties Union is weighing new standards that would discourage its board [Read More]

Tracked on May 25, 2006 7:48 AM

» Stop the ACLU Blogburst from A Lady's Ruminations
Here is today's Stop the ACLU blogburst: A.C.L.U. May Block Criticism by Its Board by Jay This is the kind of hypocrisy that Conservatives and most reasonable liberals can agree that the ACLU needs to some house cleaning on. Via NY Times.... ... [Read More]

Tracked on May 25, 2006 12:23 PM

» Putting The "D" In "DisLoyal" from Hard Starboard
The American Soviet Socialist Union is shot through with hypocrisy, the Democrat Party's racists and anti-Semites are coming (back) out of the closet, and Harry Reid, the one-time "conservative Democrat" from Nevada, has come to personify the functio... [Read More]

Tracked on May 29, 2006 10:44 AM