National Review Online has a symposium of people quoted in a press release by Vanity Fair that purported to show neoconservative abandonment of the Iraq war. VF had agreed not to release the artice before the midterm elections, but in a bit of dishonesty, repackaged quotes out of context in order to build interest in the article. Now, the sources of those mangled quotes strike back at VF.

David Frum:

There has been a lot of talk this season about deceptive campaign ads, but the most dishonest document I have seen is this press release from Vanity Fair, highlighted on the Drudge Report . Headlined “Now They Tell Us,” it purports to offer an “exclusive” access to “remorseful” former supporters of the Iraq war who will now “play the blame game” with “shocking frankness.” ... My most fundamental views on the war in Iraq remain as they were in 2003: The war was right, victory is essential, and defeat would be calamitous.

And that to my knowledge is the view of everybody quoted in the release and the piece: Adelman, Cohen, Ledeen, Perle, Pletka, Rubin, and all the others.

Michael Ledeen (a very good friend of CQ):

So it is totally misleading for Vanity Fair to suggest that I have had second thoughts about our Iraq policy. But then one shouldn’t be surprised. No one ever bothered to check any of the lies in the first screed, and obviously no fact-checker was involved in the latest “promotion.” I actually wrote to David Rose, the author of the article-to-come, a person for whom I have considerable respect. He confirmed that words attributed to me in the promo had been taken out of context.

Richard Perle:

Vanity Fair has rushed to publish a few sound bites from a lengthy discussion with David Rose. Concerned that anything I might say could be used to influence the public debate on Iraq just prior to Tuesday’s election, I had been promised that my remarks would not be published before the election.

I should have known better than to trust the editors at Vanity Fair who lied to me and to others who spoke with Mr. Rose. Moreover, in condensing and characterizing my views for their own partisan political purposes, they have distorted my opinion about the situation in Iraq and what I believe to be in the best interest of our country.

I believe it would be a catastrophic mistake to leave Iraq, as some are demanding, before the Iraqis are able to defend their elected government. As I told Mr. Rose, the terrorist threat to our country, which is real, would be made much worse if we were to make an ignominious withdrawal from Iraq.

Michael Rubin:

Vanity Fair’s agenda was a pre-election hit job, and I guess some of us quoted are at fault for believing too much in integrity. What the article seeks to do is push square pegs into round holes. Readers will see that the content of the piece does not match the sensational headlines. ...

I absolutely stand by what I said. Too many people in Washington treat foreign policy as a game. Many Washington-types who speak about Iraq care not about the U.S. servicemen or about the Iraqis, but rather focus on U.S. electoral politics. I am a Republican, but whether the Republicans or Democrats are in power, Washington’s word must mean something. Leadership is about responsibility, not just politics. We cannot go around the world betraying our allies — in this case Iraqis who believed in us or allied with us — just because of short-term political expediency.

The article has much more, especially in conveying a sense of betrayal and abandonment of ethics at Vanity Fair. All of them had been told that their interviews would not be published until January, and more than one of them said they raised their concerns about their words being taken out of context before agreeing to the interview. Vanity Fair, it seems, has much more interest in partisan politics than in honest analysis and journalism -- which is hardly surprising, given the track record to which Michael Ledeen alludes.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry is

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vanity Unfair: A Response To A Misleading Press Release:

» Vanity Unfair: A Response To A Misleading Press Release from Bill's Bites
Vanity Unfair: A Response To A Misleading Press ReleaseEd Morrissey National Review Online has a symposium of people quoted in a press release by Vanity Fair that purported to show neoconservative abandonment of the Iraq war. VF had agreed not [Read More]

Tracked on November 5, 2006 11:53 AM

» Fraud Writ Large from Blue Crab Boulevard
I did not comment on this when it came out, but it needs to be spread far and wide. Vanity Fair issued a press release saying that a lot of "Neocon" Iraq war supporters now were against the war. The left blogosphere went totally off... [Read More]

Tracked on November 5, 2006 2:51 PM

» Another Bonfire Of Vanity Fair from Ed Driscoll.com
BDS strikes Vanity Fair again. Back in March of 2005, I linked to a Weekly Standard piece by Noamie Emery in which he noted that the magazine's rampant case of Bush Derangement Syndrome was hurting its circulation:ON MARCH 6, THE... [Read More]

Tracked on November 5, 2006 4:22 PM

» Vanity Fair Article Misleading? You Don’t Say? from Sister Toldjah
Basically, the entire Vanity Fair flap boils down to these things: 1) The article in question wasn’t supposed to be out until January, and indeed, it hasn’t been released yet. What we’re seeing is what I guess you would call a press ... [Read More]

Tracked on November 5, 2006 4:27 PM

» Captain’s Quarters Reports on the Vanity Fair Meltdown from What the Heck was I Thinking!?
Ed Morrisey of The Captain’s Quarters posts more comments and statements by those "neocons" tricked by Vanity Fair and Dave Rose. It appears that VF has not only dropped the last veil, they’ve thrown away the flowers and picked u... [Read More]

Tracked on November 6, 2006 4:18 AM

» vtuctvs from rbgfpipsy
hubvwqxgzy hyhgtwfmi fiiqrwzkcia ihcrrvpeswa [Read More]

Tracked on November 6, 2006 1:18 PM