The acting Inspector General of the Defense Department has issued a long-awaited report on the intelligence analysis provided by Douglas Feith during the period between 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq. According to Thomas Gimble, Feith and others did not violate laws or policies at the Department of Defense, nor did they mislead Congress -- but Gimble still concludes that their activities were "inappropriate":

A Pentagon investigation into the handling of prewar intelligence has criticized civilian Pentagon officials for conducting their own intelligence analysis to find links between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, but said the officials did not violate any laws or mislead Congress, according to Congressional officials who have read the report.

The long-awaited report by the Pentagon’s acting inspector general, Thomas F. Gimble, was sent to Congress on Thursday. It is the first major review to rebuke senior officials working for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld for the way intelligence was used before the invasion of Iraq early in 2003.

Working under Douglas J. Feith, who at the time was under secretary of defense for policy, the group “developed, produced and then disseminated alternative intelligence assessments on the Iraq and Al Qaeda relationship, which included some conclusions that were inconsistent with the consensus of the Intelligence Community, to senior decision-makers,” the report concluded. Excerpts were quoted by Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who has long been critical of Mr. Feith and other Pentagon officials.

The report, and the dueling over its conclusions, shows that bitter divisions over the handling of prewar intelligence remain even after many of the substantive questions have been laid to rest and the principal actors have left the government.

In a rebuttal to an earlier draft of Mr. Gimble’s report, Eric S. Edelman, the under secretary of defense, said the group’s activities were authorized by Mr. Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul D. Wolfowitz. They did not produce formal intelligence assessments, and they were properly shared, the rebuttal said.

It's difficult to understand the objection of the IG. If the activity broke no laws and violated no policies, what is inappropriate about having competing sets of analysts looking at intelligence to get alternative viewpoints? One of the criticisms made by Bush administration critics is that the White House relied on stovepiped intel analysis for the WMD question -- which came from the official CIA analysts and directed by George Tenet.

In this case, the Secretary and Undersecretary of Defense wanted an investigation of intel to determine whether Iraq had operational ties to al-Qaeda, a reasonable question given the circumstances. The CIA -- which the Democrats believe got it wrong on WMD -- didn't believe that radical Islamists would cooperate with the supposedly secular Saddam Hussein. Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz authorized Feith to review the intelligence to see if evidence existed for a different conclusion, and Feith found enough contacts between Saddam and AQ to at least challenge the notion that they would have never considered a partnership.

Instead, the IG scolded Feith for not following the consensus, and then not following the procedures for "rare" disagreement. That differs rather dramatically from the scolding given to the intel communities by the 9/11 Commission and enthusiastically supported by the same elements in Congress that now want a piece of Douglas Feith for daring to disagree and to do so publicly. Back then, dissenters got celebrated as visionaries who had the courage to try to wake up the decisionmakers. Now Congress wants to punish someone who essentially did what Congress demanded during those reviews.

None of this has anything to do with the war or its intel analysis. Feith and Wolfowitz have served as targets for Democrats for years, and now that they have returned to power, they want to use whatever they can to finish them politically. Carl Levin and Jay Rockefeller can't wait to start holding hearings on the matter, even though the IG explicitly states that no laws were broken and the effort was properly revealed to Congress. This is just another venue for political payback, and nothing more.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry is

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference They Were For Dissent And Alternative Analysis Before They Were Against It:

» “An exercise in alternative thinking” from Polimom Says
This isn’t going to catch anybody by surprise (from WaPo) Intelligence provided by former undersecretary of defense Douglas J. Feith to buttress the White House case for invading Iraq included “reporting of dubious quality or reliability... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 6:58 AM

» Media, nutroots spin pre-war “improper but not illegal” intelligence story from Sister Toldjah
Don’t let the sensationalist headlines fool you. John at Powerline and Curt at Flopping Aces explain what the story is really about. Update: Here’s more via Captain Ed. ... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 8:36 AM

» How dare you question our intelligence from Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense
The title tells the story as the Pentagon IG release their report today on pre-war intelligence from the CIA which was re-looked at by the Pentagon intel guys and gals. “A Pentagon investigation into the handling of prewar intelligence has critic... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 8:42 AM

» Web Reconnaissance for 02/09/2007 from The Thunder Run
A short recon of what�s out there that might draw your attention. [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 10:00 AM

» Web Reconnaissance for 02/09/2007 from The Thunder Run
A short recon of what�s out there that might draw your attention. [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 10:00 AM

» Office of Special Plans (Running Updates) from Haft of the Spear
I expect this story to garner a lot of attention over the course of the next few days, and since I'll be in and out of the net for a bit, wanted to plant a flag for future commentary.Some of [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 10:03 AM

» Office of Special Plans (Running Updates) from Haft of the Spear
I expect this story to garner a lot of attention over the course of the next few days, and since I'll be in and out of the net for a bit, wanted to plant a flag for future commentary.Some of [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 10:13 AM

» Feith Attacked for Engaging in Independent Pre-War Analysis from The American Mind
Someone actually thought it might be illegal to undertake an independent analysis of the pre-war situation in Iraq. After the intelligence failures of the Sep. 11 attacks, the incapablility of understanding North Korea’s nucler situation, and the... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 10:30 AM

» Office of Special Plans (Running Updates) from Haft of the Spear
I expect this story to garner a lot of attention over the course of the next few days, and since I'll be in and out of the net for a bit, wanted to plant a flag for future commentary.Some of [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 12:57 PM

» Beauty is truth from Fore Left!
Conservative bloggers will probably stand alone in reminding everyone of similar Saddam-bin Laden inferences in our past, back when Mrs. Clinton was First Lady. Click to hear the now famous Sheila MacVicar ABC News report about such chilling possibil... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 2:59 PM

» Office of Special Plans (Final Updates) from Haft of the Spear
I expect this story to garner a lot of attention over the course of the next few days, and since I'll be in and out of the net for a bit, wanted to plant a flag for future commentary.Some of [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 4:17 PM

» Massive WaPo Blunder from JammieWearingFool
We're so used to the relentless media bias that we've come to expect it on a daily basis. Considering the amount of times they screw up, the mainstream press unwittingly has become a boon for bloggers over the past several years. Today we have a whop... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 8:39 PM

» The Latest Friday Night News Dump from A Blog For All
So, the Washington Post and other news outlets posted a bunch of stories today about how Douglas Feith's Office of Special Plans within the Pentagon was investigating whether there were links between al Qaeda and Iraq and that the actions of that off... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 9:14 PM

» The Latest Friday Night News Dump from A Blog For All
So, the Washington Post and other news outlets posted a bunch of stories today about how Douglas Feith's Office of Special Plans within the Pentagon was investigating whether there were links between al Qaeda and Iraq and that the actions of that off... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 9:24 PM

» The Latest Friday Night News Dump from A Blog For All
So, the Washington Post and other news outlets posted a bunch of stories today about how Douglas Feith's Office of Special Plans within the Pentagon was investigating whether there were links between al Qaeda and Iraq and that the actions of that off... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 9:27 PM

» "Devastating Commentary" from Bill's Bites
WaPo quasi-retracts page-one story about Feith Iraq/AQ intel Allahpundit Spruiell e-mails with the subject header, “Good Lord.” Indeed. They’re calling it a “correction,” but is it really a correction if you’re quoting from an entirely diff... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2007 10:00 PM

» FRI FEB 9 Christians Gone Wild! from The Pink Flamingo

SPRING TRAINING T-MINUS&nbs...

Tracked on February 10, 2007 1:45 AM

» Righties get Their Tighty-Whiteys all Bunched up. from bustardblog
When you see the wing-nut-o-sphere demonstrating that code-red level of hysteria which is theirs alone, you can be sure that they're are feeling very, very threatened. In the last twenty-four hours that hysteria has been directed against the Washington... [Read More]

Tracked on February 10, 2007 1:10 PM

» Deal in the making? from Public Secrets: from the files of the Irishspy
Tigerhawk speculates on a possible imminentdeal between North Korea and the United States, Japan, China, Russia, and South Korea to eliminate North Korea's nuclear program. He also wonders why this news, which has been leaking for several days now, has [Read More]

Tracked on February 10, 2007 2:34 PM

» Righties get Their Tighty-Whities all Bunched Up. from bustardblog
When you see the wing-nut-o-sphere demonstrating that code-red level of hysteria which is theirs alone, you can be sure that they're are feeling very, very threatened. In the last twenty-four hours that hysteria has been directed against the Washington... [Read More]

Tracked on February 10, 2007 4:28 PM