Hagel To Tilt At Windmills, Bloomberg To Be Sancho Panza
It's not too early to get some laughs from the presidential primaries. I missed this yesterday, but Chuck Hagel has begun mulling over an independent run for the presidency -- and apparently already has a running mate in mind:
The Republican Party has been "hijacked" and led away from its core values, Chuck Hagel, the Republican Senator from Nebraska, said Sunday on Face The Nation.Hagel, who is still considering his options for the 2008 race, left open the possibility of becoming an independent and sharing a ticket with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
"I am not happy with the Republican Party today," Hagel said. "It's been hijacked by a group of single-minded almost isolationists, insulationists, power-projectors."
My friends at Power Line already have had their laughs over the "insulationists" part of Hagel's comment, but the rest of it makes no sense either. Hagel complains about isolationism and power projection? Those are two mutually exclusive states. Hagel should be the last person to complain about isolationism, anyway; he's been fighting against the war in Iraq on the basis of it being an example of neocon adventurism.
The only thing hijacked is Hagel's dictionary, apparently.
Hagel then went from snickers to guffaws when he talked about his potential running mate:
After dining with former New York's mayor, who is also said to be considering a run for president as an independent, Hagel said people might want to consider the two on a ticket."We didn't make any deals, but I think Mayor Bloomberg is the kind of individual who should seriously think about this," Hagel said. "He is the mayor of one of the greatest cities on earth. He makes that city work. That's what America wants."
Bloomberg? Isn't that the mayor who has spent the last few years making Rudy Giuliani look like a libertarian? After chasing smokers and gun dealers around the island, Bloomberg wants to spend $200 million on a vanity run. That makes sense for Hagel, who has about zero chance of raising significant funds for even a Ross Perot impact on the campaign.
Hagel's not a bad guy at all, but he's fooling himself if he thinks he has any chance at all for an independent bid. Even as a potential Republican candidate, he barely draws a single percentage point in primary polling. At this rate, he'd have to explode just to reach John Anderson's high-water mark.
Comments (9)
Posted by richard mcenroe | May 14, 2007 11:54 PM
Hagel's a bad guy. He makes McCain look mainstream GOP
Posted by The Mechanical Eye | May 15, 2007 12:26 AM
It's not that there aren't any Republicans that wouldn't mind pulling out of Iraq, or at least scaling back. There's a paleocon contingent out there, and while I don't count myself among them, I agree with them on the war.
And yet I find Sen. Hagel unsatisfying - he's a chief in search of a movement, trying to artificially rally a nonexistent tribe out in the conservative fields. Worse, like McCain, he's too enamored of media attention, and comes off as a bit of a phony to his would-be supporters, who dislike the war's progress as much as he.
And worse, much of the party, as least for now, isn't ready for him. Too many GOP voters and grassroots are throughly convinced that victory in Iraq is coming this September, and to criticize the war is to spit on the troops. They may change their minds and lose their patience, but if they do I doubt it'll be this man they'll be following
I wouldn't mind a prominent anti-war Republican. But it won't be Chuck Hagel.
DU
Posted by RBMN | May 15, 2007 1:12 AM
I think Hagel has let his emotions overcome his commonsense:
From:
The private war of Chuck and Tom Hagel
By Myra MacPherson, Salon.com
April 30, 2007
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/30/hagel_brothers/index2.html
excerpt:
Posted by docjim505 | May 15, 2007 4:04 AM
I saw part of the "Face the Nation" interview, and I, too, was struck by Hagel's confusion about "insulationists".
What also struck me was the extent to which Bob Schieffer was stroking Hagel's ego. "C'mon. You're gonna run, right? I mean, you'd be just PERFECT. You're gonna announce any day now, aren't you?" No wonder Hagel is the MSM's favorite "Republican": if they feed his ego a little, he'll say anything that they want, and they can go to press with headlines like, "Prominent Republican Criticizes Bush" or "GOP Presidential Hopeful Blasts Iraq Policy".
The sap doesn't even realize that he's being used.
As for a Hagel / Bloomberg ticket... Oh, yeah. THAT will go over great with the average Republican. Such a ticket might do well in the northeast, where Republicans tend to be democrat-lite (witness Lincoln Chafee and the Maine Girls), but I doubt it would do well at all in the rest of the country.
Posted by Gary Gross | May 15, 2007 5:48 AM
As I wrote here, Little Chuckie Hagel thinks that people still take him seriously. He hasn't figured out that he's a laughingstock.
BTW, I've done a little digging into his re-election campaign. What I've found should make every conservative pray that he launches a presidential bid as an independent. Here's a post about the man that would replace Hagel:
I think it's time that we start hoping for Hagel's run as an independent.
Posted by MarkD | May 15, 2007 8:34 AM
I welcome a Hagel/Bloomberg run. They will take more votes from the Democrats than the Republicans.
Hagel has stronger antiwar credentials than Hillary. Bloomberg is the secular equivalent of the religious right - the prototypical nanny statist.
Posted by burt | May 15, 2007 8:41 AM
I think this post is out of date. Bloomberg's campaign has leaked that he is setting aside $1 B for his campaign. I think it unlikely he would choose Hagel as a running mate. Of course I have been surprised that the people of Nebraska have chosen Hagel for senator.
Posted by Ripper | May 15, 2007 9:20 AM
The raging alcoholic Hagel would not want Bloomberg as a running mate, Bloomberg (for all his elitist faults) is very pro Israel while Hagel carried water for Hezbollah.
Posted by mw | May 15, 2007 11:34 AM
"Hagel's not a bad guy at all, but he's fooling himself if he thinks he has any chance at all for an independent bid. Even as a potential Republican candidate, he barely draws a single percentage point in primary polling." -ed
Yeah, it is a connundrum. As a Republican he'd win the general election in a walk, pulling from moderates, libertarians, and conservative democrats, but he cannot get past the vocal minority on the right to get the nomination. Not sure what I'll do if he goes Independent. I'm committed to voting Republican for President to maintain divided government, and he'd certainly kill the GOP's chances if he does.
Anderson in the primary is not an apt comparison. Perot in the general election is the right comparison. We know how that turned out.
Interesting what New Yorkers think about Rudy vs. Bloomie. It is not even close. I have also heard that the whole Unity08 effort is really a stalking horse for the Bloomie campaign. If so, that could pave the way for a late independent entry, by doing the hard work of getting on the ballots ahead of time. But I don't understand how Hagel and Bloomberg could pair up on Unity08 - I thought their whole schtick was to get a Republican and a Democrat on the same ticket.