About
Captain Ed is a father and grandfather living in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota, a native Californian who moved to the North Star State because of the weather. He lives with his wife Marcia, also known as the First Mate, their two dogs, and frequently watch their granddaughter Kayla, whom Captain Ed calls The Little Admiral.
Read More
The Crows Nest
Would Early Primaries Allow More Donations?
Jim Geraghty at The Campaign Spot believes that candidates will benefit if primaries and caucuses get pushed into 2007. A loophole in campaign finance regulation appears to allow an extra $2,300 per donor for candidates if those elections are held this year. Be sure to check out Jim's analysis, and the surprising candidate that may benefit the most.
When Tom Met Jeralyn
One of the interesting aspects of politics is finding out that opponents are people, too. Jeralyn Merritt of TalkLeft met Rep. Tom Tancredo backstage at NBC's studios, and found him more likable than she had anticipated. Perhaps it was their mutual interest in Dog, The Bounty Hunter ...
Joe Lieberman A Right-Wing Nut?
That's what CAIR says, according to Joe Kaufman. He has a link to a CAIR official's blog post that calls Lieberman, along with John Bolton, former CIA director James Woolsey, and the Heritage Foundation's Peter Brookes as "extremists". Affad Shaikh also calls Dick Cheney a "fat bastard of a liar," apparently not meant as a pop-culture reference to the Austin Powers movies. (via Let Freedom Ring)
Broadband Homelessness
The Japanese have made homelessness more efficient, and more Net-friendly, too. Their Internet cafés have become homeless shelters for the struggling manual-labor sector. The problem has grown into such a problem that government intervention will shortly become a political priority.
Found My Law Firm
Power Line links twice to this story regarding an attorney at Faegre & Benson who refused to become a victim and helped capture a very dangerous man. Keith Radtke is a partner in the firm as is Power Line's John Hinderaker. Radtke is listed in satisfactory condition after getting shot in the back, but that didn't keep him from locking up his attacker in a wrestling grip until police could arrive. I don't know about you, but that's the kind of man I'd want as my counsel ....
Don't Click That YouTube E-mail
The latest in spam seems to be redirections from YouTube links in e-mail to IP addresses without domain names. They attempt to entice people by making it seem that they have been inadvertently YouTubed. I'm sure most people can see through this scam, but just in case, you've been warned ....
Rick Moran Escapes The Floods
Rick Moran has kept us up to date on his travails along the Algonquin River. Yesterday, the police showed up to get him evacuated before the river flooded his home -- but today, Rick finds that a minor miracle has taken place, and that his house survives ... at least for now. Keep Rick in your prayers, and keep checking in at Right Wing Nut House for updates.
Rule 1: Drag The Corpse On Over First
If I've learned anything in four years of blogging, don't try to be out in front of the death rumors, especially with the villains of the world. Saddam died a hundred deaths before we caught him alive in his spider hole, and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi almost as many before his demise last year. Osama may or may not be alive, but everyone's avoided speculating on his fate for a while now. Maybe Val at Babalu Blog will get luckier with his "Castro Is Dead" story. We all hope so. I'll wait for the announcement ....
Hobbs Choice
Volunteer Voters is holding its annual "Best of Nashville" on-line polls, and one of the categories is for the best political writer. Our friend Bill Hobbs, now posting at Newsbusters, and he'd like his on-line fans to cast their votes. Drop by and put one in for Bill if you get a chance!
Murtha Getting Backlogged On Apologies
Gary Gross of Let Freedom Ring sees another case collapsing on the Haditha charges. He's called for Murtha to apologize earlier, and adds another reason to the tally.
No Such Thing As 'Moderate' Islam?
Turkish PM Tayyip Erdogan told a television interviewer that he finds the label "moderate Islam" offensive. Shrink Wrapped has a lot more on this, but at least in the same interview Erdogan acknowledged that "radical Islam" exists, and that it's been a catastrophe. Be sure to read the whole post.
MS-NBC Gets Punk'd
Power Line has a great post on a lack of journalistic effort on the part of MS-NBC. In covering the Michael Vick story, they reported on what they thought was Al Sharpton's website proclaiming Vick's innocence. I guess Alex Johnson and two other MS-NBC reporters couldn't bother to read the title bar of the site, which proudly proclaims it as a "parody site".
New Instapundit Podcast On Pharmaceuticals
I just caught this e-mail from Glenn Reynolds about his new podcast with Richard Epstein, the author of Overdose: How Excessive Government Regulation Stifles Pharmaceutical Innovation. Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but the topic is important enough to make sure I carve out time for it tomorrow. Get their first and tell me what I'm missing ....
Fed Trying A 'Stealth Easing'?
The Federal Reserve seems to have conducted a quiet campaign to steady markets that started spinning out of control, according to King Banaian at SCSU Scholars. He thinks that the Fed has conducted a "stealth easing". Be sure to read his explanation and follow his lnks.
A Shameless Bit Of Sel-Promotion
Gateway Pundit and Val at Babalu Blog note a crass PR move by Hugo Chavez. Venezuela has responded to Peru's eathquake disaster with food shipments -- and with Hugo's smiling picture on the cans. He also uses the tuna-can label to undermine President Garcia of Peru, who narrowly defeated Chavez' pal Ollanto Humalla, whom the labels extol for his "solidarity" with Chavez.
Tacky beyond belief.
Comments (12)
Posted by quickjustice | July 24, 2007 12:03 PM
Nuclear fusion, use of new technology to reduce resistance on high voltage transmission lines, and enabling internet transmission over power lines.
'Nuff said.
Posted by quickjustice | July 24, 2007 12:05 PM
Nuclear fusion, use of new technology to reduce resistance on high voltage transmission lines, and enabling internet transmission over power lines.
'Nuff said.
Posted by quickjustice | July 24, 2007 12:21 PM
Based upon your Heading Right article, I should add that corn ethanol production is a massive subsidy for corn farmers that takes more energy to produce than the ethanol it produces. In other words, subsidies for corn ethanol are a huge waste of tax dollars.
The real payoff in this area is biomass conversion to ethanol-- conversion of organic trash, for example, to ethanol. We lack reliable technologies to do that right now. Developing such technologies would be a genuine breakthrough. Those would be worth subsidies.
Posted by CA civvy | July 24, 2007 1:04 PM
The "Moon Shot" or "Manhattan project" comparison is a poor one. In those cases you had one customer (the feds) with an unlimited budget and very limited competition, trying to accomplish one fairly specific thing. In the case of energy, you have a nearly infinite number of customers and applications, with numerous low-cost competitors in the market. If you want "Manhattan Project" type performance from the feds, I would say you need to give them a more specific goal than "energy independence".
Posted by Rob | July 24, 2007 1:08 PM
We have a enough oil and shale in this country to last about 130 years using current technology. It would be much cleaner for us to use now since most of our oil & gas infrastructure is based on technology that is at least thirty years old and dates from the 1970's oil boom. Developing our oil, gas, and shale resources would provide jobs for Americans. It would keep our energy dollars in America. It would be dependable and uneffected by political instability. Americans and not Jihadis would get the royalities. And It is available NOW!
Posted by Larry J | July 24, 2007 1:39 PM
Another weakness of the "Moon Shot" style of the government is that the waste and inefficiency is terrible. NASA's unofficial motto during the 1960s was "Waste anything but time." Massive overruns and several dead astronauts were the result (the Apollo 1 crew plus others killed in aircraft accidents).
Subsidizies can be useful while helping a new technology get on its feet. However, subsidizies distort the marketplace and pass the true costs from the consumers to the taxpayers at large. Any subsidizy should have a definite phase out period, say 5-10 years. After that time, if the technology can't compete on its own, it deserves to fail.
I believe achieving energy independence requires a three-pronged approach:
1. Improved conservation to reduce the rate of growth in energy consumption. Conservation on its own isn't going to allow us to be self-sufficient. However, reducing the rate of growth would amount to a large savings over time.
2. Increase domestic energy production by allowing oil and gas drilling at some of the places that are currently off limits.
3. Implement alternative technologies where possible and practical. One size does not fit all. Wind power can be practical in some areas but is completely useless in others. The same applies to solar and other alternative technologies. Increase nuclear electric production and work to increase cleaner burning coal powerplants.
Posted by exDemo | July 24, 2007 2:11 PM
The Bush administration successes at energy field have never been reported widely.
From longterm to short term perspective let us look at what Mr. bush has accomplished.
First the Bush Administration in one of its unheralded diplomatic triumphs recreated a international organization to fund and build the last Physics experiment on Fusion and simultaneously the first Engineering experiment to build a large power reactor sized Fusion reactor. ITER under construction in France is being built and paid for by the EU Russia, Japan, S Korea, China, India, Brazil, and the USA. Canada will rejoin soon. That solves energy problem from 2035 onward and permanently.
For the intermediate term, Bush has worked to reform the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's red tape and NIMBY obstructionism by:
a) First he worked in creating a Combined Construction and Operating License that will allow predictable and controllable costs in Building a nuclear fission power plant. The environmentally; clean and economic fission plants are fine, after the concerns and disruption of erecting them are solved.
B) Secondly he has enlisted the Nuke builders to invest billions of dollars to upgrade proven designs, increase Passive safety systems. In addition he go them to agree to pre-certify "standard designs" that have orders of magnitude safer systems than the present generation of current production Power plants.
c) As a result the pipeline in filling; 29 power plants are seeking approvals for construction in the USA. And many more applications are lining up will follow. These Generation III+ group of fission plants will power the country until Fusion is ready to take over. These Plants will simultaneously help clean the air and reduce fossil emissions.
d) These new plants will be are providing the electrical power the country needs. It also relieves the pressure on fossil supplies that would have come by building fossil power plants instead.
For the short term, Bush has been unsuccessful in opening the East and West coasts and Alaska to drilling. He has been unsuccessful in allowing the licensing and erection of more petroleum refineries as well,.
But short term, many bio replacements for fossil fuels are being constructed to tide the country over for the next decade or two. Ethanol and Bio diesel manufacturing efforts can't replace much more than 10-15% of demand,. But it eases supply and price pressures. Taken together with the substitution of power from the new Nukes displacing other fossil demand, can reduce fossil demand significantly.
Petroleum has a very concentrated market . Over 80% goes to but a single application; that application is transport. Ground transport accounts for 70+% of total petroleum demand and 85+%% of all transport demand. Another 10-12 % goes to provide chemical feed stocks. The rest is space heating or industrial uses. In all these other uses, their are substitutes that can be readily used. these range from coal for feedstock, to electricity for space heating and industrial power use.
Substitutes continue to penetrate in these markets. Most steel making now uses electricity to make most US steel, for example. Industry uses no wmoire fossil energy today than it did twenty years ago.
Electric substitution experiments in ground transport , subsidized by government funding, appears to be making progress. Soon battery dependent HEVs, PHEVs and BEVs will populate the roads in numbers swelling as we speak.
In summary, Bush has addressed and solve the energy problem. Now we merely have to wait and watch the solutions work out over the short term of the next decade or decade and a half.
Posted by amr | July 24, 2007 2:13 PM
I agree with Mr. Giuliani about energy independence. However I do know from a recent visit to Fort Yukon, Alaska which is in the ANWR region that the local Native Americans are against drilling in that area or offshore in the Arctic Ocean. That sentiment will be hard to overcome just as Mr. Kennedy’s opinion that his view will be impacted during his sailing has almost shutdown the development of off shore wind power in his state. And drilling off Florida is off limits; however the Cubans have contracted the Chinese to do so in their portion of the sea off of the Keys. Don’t even talk about drilling off the California coast. But there are 30 new nuclear power plants being proposed. Mostly on existing sites that are licensed for additional units. And I can’t wait for the environmental impact discussions for recovering oil from our shale deposits.
One possible policy change could help in the short term alleviate the shortage of refining capability, possibly lower the price of gasoline by easing distribution. We reportedly have 42 or more blends of gasoline being produced in this country to satisfy environmental concerns. Seemingly the GAO can’t determine the actual number. If my information is correct, the California blend is the most environmentally sound, but possibly the most expensive based on the net cost to produce on a limited scale. We now have a system with built-in supply shortages because of limited refining capability, refinery outages, shutdowns and/or breakdowns which all keep the price higher than necessary assuming all other costs/taxes are constant. The Chicago area BP proposed refinery shows the problems associated with constructing new facilities.
Presently refineries have to switch processes to produce other blends and pipe lines are dedicated to a certain blend at any one time. Highway tanker or railway transport from other refineries from greater distance after shutdowns would also increase costs. After Katrina, when one pipe line to the east coast was shutdown, the necessity to produce these different blends was suspended and there was minimal disruption of the supplies of fuel. I certainly don’t remember any rationing, although some media reports indicated that filling stations did run out of gasoline; possibly due to panic buying based on hyping by the media of the future uncertainty of gasoline supplies.
A free market price is a reflection of supply and demand. We now have an artificial government mandated market which should be modified to allow one blend for the nation.
Posted by Project Vote Smart | July 24, 2007 5:08 PM
Mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s history of speeches on energy issues can be found at: http://www.votesmart.org/speech.php?keyword=energy&daterange=&begin=&end=&phrase=&contain=&without=&type=search&can_id=15784&go2.x=0&go2.y=0#Results
For more information on Mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s position on energy issues please visit http://www.vote-smart.org or call our hotline at 1-888-VOTE-SMART.
Posted by abw | July 24, 2007 7:41 PM
Capt, two questions for Rudy's energy guy:
According to this story:
In this fiscal year, the Energy Department plans to spend $159 million on solar research and development. It will spend nearly double, $303 million, on nuclear energy research and development, and nearly triple, $427 million, on coal, as well as $167 million on other fossil fuel research and development.
How would Rudy propose changing these current efforts? (ie, would he double everything, increase solar and decrease nuclear, etc)
Also, does he support the current ethonal policy and what does he think of criticism that food prices are rising unnecessarily because of this use.
Posted by M. Simon | July 24, 2007 11:06 PM
It appears that the Republican Governor of Calif. may be backing Fusion Energy
California to Fund Bussard Fusion
Posted by M. Simon | July 24, 2007 11:14 PM
ITER is never going to be economically viable. Its cost will be 30X that of an equivalent fission plant.
It is a boondoggle for physicists.