About
Captain Ed is a father and grandfather living in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota, a native Californian who moved to the North Star State because of the weather. He lives with his wife Marcia, also known as the First Mate, their two dogs, and frequently watch their granddaughter Kayla, whom Captain Ed calls The Little Admiral.
Read More
The Crows Nest
There Goes The Undefeated Season
Notre Dame managed to get its first loss out of the way as soon as possible -- and as badly as possible. Georgia Tech came to South Bend and stomped the Irish, 33-3, in the worst home opener loss in school history. The offense fumbled twice and allowed seven sacks on Evan Sharpley, who must have longed to have Brady Quinn back on the field instead. If Charlie Weis doesn't turn this debacle around fast, he may want to start asking Ty Willingham for some career counseling ....
Would Early Primaries Allow More Donations?
Jim Geraghty at The Campaign Spot believes that candidates will benefit if primaries and caucuses get pushed into 2007. A loophole in campaign finance regulation appears to allow an extra $2,300 per donor for candidates if those elections are held this year. Be sure to check out Jim's analysis, and the surprising candidate that may benefit the most.
When Tom Met Jeralyn
One of the interesting aspects of politics is finding out that opponents are people, too. Jeralyn Merritt of TalkLeft met Rep. Tom Tancredo backstage at NBC's studios, and found him more likable than she had anticipated. Perhaps it was their mutual interest in Dog, The Bounty Hunter ...
Joe Lieberman A Right-Wing Nut?
That's what CAIR says, according to Joe Kaufman. He has a link to a CAIR official's blog post that calls Lieberman, along with John Bolton, former CIA director James Woolsey, and the Heritage Foundation's Peter Brookes as "extremists". Affad Shaikh also calls Dick Cheney a "fat bastard of a liar," apparently not meant as a pop-culture reference to the Austin Powers movies. (via Let Freedom Ring)
Broadband Homelessness
The Japanese have made homelessness more efficient, and more Net-friendly, too. Their Internet cafés have become homeless shelters for the struggling manual-labor sector. The problem has grown into such a problem that government intervention will shortly become a political priority.
Found My Law Firm
Power Line links twice to this story regarding an attorney at Faegre & Benson who refused to become a victim and helped capture a very dangerous man. Keith Radtke is a partner in the firm as is Power Line's John Hinderaker. Radtke is listed in satisfactory condition after getting shot in the back, but that didn't keep him from locking up his attacker in a wrestling grip until police could arrive. I don't know about you, but that's the kind of man I'd want as my counsel ....
Don't Click That YouTube E-mail
The latest in spam seems to be redirections from YouTube links in e-mail to IP addresses without domain names. They attempt to entice people by making it seem that they have been inadvertently YouTubed. I'm sure most people can see through this scam, but just in case, you've been warned ....
Rick Moran Escapes The Floods
Rick Moran has kept us up to date on his travails along the Algonquin River. Yesterday, the police showed up to get him evacuated before the river flooded his home -- but today, Rick finds that a minor miracle has taken place, and that his house survives ... at least for now. Keep Rick in your prayers, and keep checking in at Right Wing Nut House for updates.
Rule 1: Drag The Corpse On Over First
If I've learned anything in four years of blogging, don't try to be out in front of the death rumors, especially with the villains of the world. Saddam died a hundred deaths before we caught him alive in his spider hole, and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi almost as many before his demise last year. Osama may or may not be alive, but everyone's avoided speculating on his fate for a while now. Maybe Val at Babalu Blog will get luckier with his "Castro Is Dead" story. We all hope so. I'll wait for the announcement ....
Hobbs Choice
Volunteer Voters is holding its annual "Best of Nashville" on-line polls, and one of the categories is for the best political writer. Our friend Bill Hobbs, now posting at Newsbusters, and he'd like his on-line fans to cast their votes. Drop by and put one in for Bill if you get a chance!
Murtha Getting Backlogged On Apologies
Gary Gross of Let Freedom Ring sees another case collapsing on the Haditha charges. He's called for Murtha to apologize earlier, and adds another reason to the tally.
No Such Thing As 'Moderate' Islam?
Turkish PM Tayyip Erdogan told a television interviewer that he finds the label "moderate Islam" offensive. Shrink Wrapped has a lot more on this, but at least in the same interview Erdogan acknowledged that "radical Islam" exists, and that it's been a catastrophe. Be sure to read the whole post.
MS-NBC Gets Punk'd
Power Line has a great post on a lack of journalistic effort on the part of MS-NBC. In covering the Michael Vick story, they reported on what they thought was Al Sharpton's website proclaiming Vick's innocence. I guess Alex Johnson and two other MS-NBC reporters couldn't bother to read the title bar of the site, which proudly proclaims it as a "parody site".
New Instapundit Podcast On Pharmaceuticals
I just caught this e-mail from Glenn Reynolds about his new podcast with Richard Epstein, the author of Overdose: How Excessive Government Regulation Stifles Pharmaceutical Innovation. Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but the topic is important enough to make sure I carve out time for it tomorrow. Get their first and tell me what I'm missing ....
Fed Trying A 'Stealth Easing'?
The Federal Reserve seems to have conducted a quiet campaign to steady markets that started spinning out of control, according to King Banaian at SCSU Scholars. He thinks that the Fed has conducted a "stealth easing". Be sure to read his explanation and follow his lnks.
Comments (8)
Posted by Lightwave | August 17, 2007 1:33 PM
It's not puzzling at all Ed when you take into account the difference between perception and reality.
The perception is that the Dems have to continue to kiss Kos' ring, after all this group is the only constituency the Dems have that are even remotely excited about the party right now. Yes, the nutroots can affect perceptions through their blogs and conferences as well as astroturf activism.
But the reality is that the nutroots have been relgated to the dustbin of history. As Kimberly Strassel points out, the Kos Kids have largely failed so far and seem to think the problem is they aren't leftist enough. You have but to look no further than the triangulating of the Democrat leadership away from that little idea. Their actions speak louder than words, and their actions are that they continue to have a large moderate-to-conservative bloc in the Blue Dogs and the Lieberman wing that realize that the only way to even remotely have a chance to save the party is to cooperate with the GOP and the President on Iraq. They know that the moderate swing voters won't be going after Republican heads should we give into the defeatist crowd, but they will indeed eviscerate the Democrats.
In effect, Kimberly Strassel is saying that the Kos wing of the party doesn't know the difference between perception and reality, and that by giving in to the elitist liberals' perceptions, the reality will crush the Democrats in 2008.
The bottom line? Strassel seems to think the Dem leadership is smarter than the nutroots. That's a bit like saying gravel tastes better than broken glass, but there you have it.
I guess having a viable second party is good for the nation, if it's the Harold Fords and Joe Liebermans of the world.
Posted by bulbasaur | August 17, 2007 1:39 PM
I celebrate the McGovernization of the democrat party.
Posted by unclesmrgol | August 17, 2007 1:45 PM
No inconsistancies here. Her point -- if you throw enough mud long enough, sooner or later your aim will improve to the point that some will stick.
Posted by athingortwo | August 17, 2007 2:08 PM
Cap'n, I think you mis-interpreted Ms. Strassel's piece. For one, it was not an editorial - it was a news analysis article. I didn't see that it advocated for or against anyone, including the netroots or their targets in the Dem Party. The article simply analyzed the netroots' attempts to bludgeon conservative/moderate members of the Democratic caucus, focusing primarily on Rep Cuellar of Texas. She reviews the netroots' tactics, and then the response of Cuellar and some of his "blue dog" compatriots, and how the Blue Dogs are doing in actual elections since the purge began.
I don't read any "castigating" of the netroots in Strassel's article at all. There is nothing puzzling about her analysis, and she does not conclude that the netroots are either growing in influence, as you say, nor the opposite either. I think the point one can take away from Ms. STrassel's analysis is that the netroots aren't as effective in ridding the Democratic Party of blue dogs as they'd like to be, but the long term effects of the netroots campaign are not yet clear.
Posted by Carol Herman | August 17, 2007 3:19 PM
The powers are ebbing. To both the right and left wing "factions." Over in the extremes, in the past, they've affected how some presidents get nominated.
Yet, while some things change. (And, they do.) Another thing can hold firm. So, I think 1860; Lincoln's nomination, at such a critical juncture in our history; will bare out, again, in 2008.
By now Iowa's been marginalized. And, Florida? Oh, that's an interesting one to come. Because Floridians may wake up to delegates being "apportioned," instead of what you have now: The winner takes all. (Lots of money has gone into the bet that ALL the delegates makes Florida a "worthy gamble.")
Then? If you add up all the campaign promises made to factions, you'd end up with a score card high on bullshit. Since you're not getting very much back for your votes. And, the more pressures that are put on parties just alienates the mainstream.
To the point? I'm willing to gamble that if Guiliani is "closed out" by the factional politics within the GOP, he will go INDEPENDENT. He's not gonna go away.
It's just a question of "what can he capture."
Remember this. In 1860 the GOP was UNTRIED. And, the Bonkeys were very willing to "compromise." THEY LOST!
Do people lose in politics? You bet'cha.
Do they lose in other markets? You can bet that, too. Does it pay not to buy? Hell, no. Because most of the time, if you're buying wisely it's better than "to rent."
Bush's legacy is that he used the Military in Irak and Afghanistan. But he was very slow; and very disinterested in the "politics." Other than he was "guided by the Saud's" to go get them some more real estate. IN that, he failed.
My guess is that Americans, today, have major interests in areas where politicians don't even want to get involved. And, if we're lucky, this will spell disaster for some of these stinking politicians.
The other hope? Given the "types" that gain entry, over and over again. No matter how often you shout "term limits," what has to happen ahead? When these winning critters get together to vote in their own leadership, they better be aprised how, so far, so many failed.
In another field, the stage, the Barrymore's once ruled. But that's now how you get famous these days. Doesn't come through your mother's hips.
The other unknown? Will the measily MSM, which is not really mainstream, any longer. Will they prevail? Just because they earn good salaries; while there's not much else they can do except flip burgers ... makes ya wonder. In other words, we're watching the processes where the marketplace isn't heard. And, where elites think they can force things down the throats of others.
What's at stake, now? The whole magila, that came in with affirmative action. A sinking boat in a swamp. People aren't voting for this crap, either.
Nor are people voting to throw women into jail for having abortions. It's just not up there on the horizon as a vote-catcher. Has it poisoned the well for the religious folks? Yeah. That's why Guiliani can be bold. AND, HE IS! He gets through like signals in clusters of noise. And, that's worth watching.
Posted by the fly-man | August 17, 2007 4:21 PM
Out- of- the- mainstream views, isn't castigation? So after a couple of years and elections, the Netroots are simply marginalized by some one at the WSJ? isn't this the same WSJ that has sat back for years watching the stock market sing along while Iraq was just a correctable, give it time, opportunity? After all the VP was in charge. So I find it fairly disingenuous, and predictable, for an old world media rag to try bury a new power base. Mr. Liberman actually had to campaign for his seat, that had to be a wake up call.
Posted by Ray | August 17, 2007 6:59 PM
the fly-man,
The "new power base" you speak of is simply a segment of the old power base that has been given a new means to communicate and coordinate. The term "netroot" itself is nothing more than a fancy moniker for yet another means of coordinating grass-root types of campaigning. This isn't a case of previously maligned supporters suddenly finding a direct connection to their candidates, it is a case of a very public means of gathering and coordinating the supporters that already exist.
The same people that populate the "netroot" base previously supported their candidates through other means like the contribution of money to their candidates and grass-root campaigning like delivering fliers and door to door campaigning. They use to coordinate between themselves through face to face meeting and phone calls, so this type of coordination is nothing new. The blogs and other Internet sites just allow the supporters to communicate and coordinate faster and easier then ever before.
Are they effective? Yes, but no more so then just a few years ago before such technology was utilized. This is because the "netroot" is utilizing technology to coordinate the existing supporters and very few people will align themselves with a particular candidate simply because of the efforts of grass-root campaigning. That's why their base is not expanding very much.
Posted by english teacher | August 17, 2007 7:15 PM
good analysis captain, to which i can only add the even more obvious question "why would any democrat in their right mind pay any heed to what the wsj editorial page says democrats should be doing"????