About
Captain Ed is a father and grandfather living in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota, a native Californian who moved to the North Star State because of the weather. He lives with his wife Marcia, also known as the First Mate, their two dogs, and frequently watch their granddaughter Kayla, whom Captain Ed calls The Little Admiral.
Read More
The Crows Nest
Would Early Primaries Allow More Donations?
Jim Geraghty at The Campaign Spot believes that candidates will benefit if primaries and caucuses get pushed into 2007. A loophole in campaign finance regulation appears to allow an extra $2,300 per donor for candidates if those elections are held this year. Be sure to check out Jim's analysis, and the surprising candidate that may benefit the most.
When Tom Met Jeralyn
One of the interesting aspects of politics is finding out that opponents are people, too. Jeralyn Merritt of TalkLeft met Rep. Tom Tancredo backstage at NBC's studios, and found him more likable than she had anticipated. Perhaps it was their mutual interest in Dog, The Bounty Hunter ...
Joe Lieberman A Right-Wing Nut?
That's what CAIR says, according to Joe Kaufman. He has a link to a CAIR official's blog post that calls Lieberman, along with John Bolton, former CIA director James Woolsey, and the Heritage Foundation's Peter Brookes as "extremists". Affad Shaikh also calls Dick Cheney a "fat bastard of a liar," apparently not meant as a pop-culture reference to the Austin Powers movies. (via Let Freedom Ring)
Broadband Homelessness
The Japanese have made homelessness more efficient, and more Net-friendly, too. Their Internet cafés have become homeless shelters for the struggling manual-labor sector. The problem has grown into such a problem that government intervention will shortly become a political priority.
Found My Law Firm
Power Line links twice to this story regarding an attorney at Faegre & Benson who refused to become a victim and helped capture a very dangerous man. Keith Radtke is a partner in the firm as is Power Line's John Hinderaker. Radtke is listed in satisfactory condition after getting shot in the back, but that didn't keep him from locking up his attacker in a wrestling grip until police could arrive. I don't know about you, but that's the kind of man I'd want as my counsel ....
Don't Click That YouTube E-mail
The latest in spam seems to be redirections from YouTube links in e-mail to IP addresses without domain names. They attempt to entice people by making it seem that they have been inadvertently YouTubed. I'm sure most people can see through this scam, but just in case, you've been warned ....
Rick Moran Escapes The Floods
Rick Moran has kept us up to date on his travails along the Algonquin River. Yesterday, the police showed up to get him evacuated before the river flooded his home -- but today, Rick finds that a minor miracle has taken place, and that his house survives ... at least for now. Keep Rick in your prayers, and keep checking in at Right Wing Nut House for updates.
Rule 1: Drag The Corpse On Over First
If I've learned anything in four years of blogging, don't try to be out in front of the death rumors, especially with the villains of the world. Saddam died a hundred deaths before we caught him alive in his spider hole, and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi almost as many before his demise last year. Osama may or may not be alive, but everyone's avoided speculating on his fate for a while now. Maybe Val at Babalu Blog will get luckier with his "Castro Is Dead" story. We all hope so. I'll wait for the announcement ....
Hobbs Choice
Volunteer Voters is holding its annual "Best of Nashville" on-line polls, and one of the categories is for the best political writer. Our friend Bill Hobbs, now posting at Newsbusters, and he'd like his on-line fans to cast their votes. Drop by and put one in for Bill if you get a chance!
Murtha Getting Backlogged On Apologies
Gary Gross of Let Freedom Ring sees another case collapsing on the Haditha charges. He's called for Murtha to apologize earlier, and adds another reason to the tally.
No Such Thing As 'Moderate' Islam?
Turkish PM Tayyip Erdogan told a television interviewer that he finds the label "moderate Islam" offensive. Shrink Wrapped has a lot more on this, but at least in the same interview Erdogan acknowledged that "radical Islam" exists, and that it's been a catastrophe. Be sure to read the whole post.
MS-NBC Gets Punk'd
Power Line has a great post on a lack of journalistic effort on the part of MS-NBC. In covering the Michael Vick story, they reported on what they thought was Al Sharpton's website proclaiming Vick's innocence. I guess Alex Johnson and two other MS-NBC reporters couldn't bother to read the title bar of the site, which proudly proclaims it as a "parody site".
New Instapundit Podcast On Pharmaceuticals
I just caught this e-mail from Glenn Reynolds about his new podcast with Richard Epstein, the author of Overdose: How Excessive Government Regulation Stifles Pharmaceutical Innovation. Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but the topic is important enough to make sure I carve out time for it tomorrow. Get their first and tell me what I'm missing ....
Fed Trying A 'Stealth Easing'?
The Federal Reserve seems to have conducted a quiet campaign to steady markets that started spinning out of control, according to King Banaian at SCSU Scholars. He thinks that the Fed has conducted a "stealth easing". Be sure to read his explanation and follow his lnks.
A Shameless Bit Of Sel-Promotion
Gateway Pundit and Val at Babalu Blog note a crass PR move by Hugo Chavez. Venezuela has responded to Peru's eathquake disaster with food shipments -- and with Hugo's smiling picture on the cans. He also uses the tuna-can label to undermine President Garcia of Peru, who narrowly defeated Chavez' pal Ollanto Humalla, whom the labels extol for his "solidarity" with Chavez.
Tacky beyond belief.
Comments (18)
Posted by stackja1945 | August 29, 2007 6:35 AM
According to the left-wing agenda, this is a defeat for the USA.
The USA must immediately retreat.
Posted by bayam | August 29, 2007 6:49 AM
Unfortunately, Karzi and other credible sources are telling us that the security situation in Afghanistan has continued to deteriorate over the past year. Despite American military superiority, the ability of the Taliban to mount this kind of attack isn't a great sign. A recent UN report also cited Afghanistan as a larger producer of drugs than Columbia and Peru combined- not exactly a promising outcome.
The war in Afghanistan has broad political support in the US. It's unfortunate that our leaders aren't doing more to support coalitian forces and rebuilding programs in that country. You'd think that some of our new allies in E. Europe might be convinced to make a larger commitment in manpower. It's easy for the fight in Iraq to oversahdow Afghanistan, but it shouldn't.
Posted by wolfwalker | August 29, 2007 7:18 AM
Despite American military superiority, the ability of the Taliban to mount this kind of attack isn't a great sign.
100 casualties suggests an attacking force somewhere between company-size and battalion-size -- that is, somewhere between 100 and 1000 men. That's not a particularly large force for an enemy that claims to have hundreds of thousands of followers.
A recent UN report also cited Afghanistan as a larger producer of drugs than Columbia and Peru combined- not exactly a promising outcome.
No, it isn't. We agree on that. It's an unintended consequence of three facts: the removal of the antidrug Taliban; the fact that the opium poppy is one of few crops that will grow well in Afghanistan; and the enormous black-market price that opium brings. What's the best answer to it? Well, the medical painkiller morphine is an opiate, just as heroin is. And some sources claim that there's a worldwide shortage of morphine. What do you think would happen if the Coalition provided funds to buy up the opium crop at current market prices, then sent the entire crop into the legitimate morphine market instead of the illegal heroin market?
Posted by Cybrludite | August 29, 2007 7:18 AM
Despite American military superiority, the ability of the Taliban to mount this kind of attack isn't a great sign.
So you're saying that it's a bad sign that the Taliban still crowd together close enough for us to kill them in batch lots like this? That they seem incapable of learning from their mistakes? (Granted, a lot of the ones making these mistakes aren't around afterwards to learn from them and pass the lessions on...)
Posted by Clyde | August 29, 2007 7:21 AM
Sure hate it for them.
The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist. I applaud our military's successful effort to turn this latest batch into good terrorists.
Posted by Bennett | August 29, 2007 7:29 AM
"The Taliban continues to prove wildly inept at actual warfare. They lost 100-1 in this engagement -- when they had tactical surprise and presumably the best ground."
Well it was probably really a wedding, that's why they were so unprepared. Isn't that what usually gets reported? That the military mistook a harmless gathering for an armed attack.
Posted by NahnCee | August 29, 2007 8:36 AM
Waiting for the first claim from some Afghan warlord that 90 of those 100 killed were innocent civilian goatherders.
Posted by Casper | August 29, 2007 8:36 AM
"According to the left-wing agenda, this is a defeat for the USA.
The USA must immediately retreat."
Retreat from Afghanistan? Dude, you are out of your head. Find me one single credible left-wing source that is rallying for a withdrawal from Afghanistan. The left wing is calling for a withdrawal from Iraq, not Afghanistan. I know ya'll still think Saddam was responsible for 9/11 and all, so I can see how you'd get confused, but do try and keep up.
I too applaud our military in crushing the Taliban and anyone else associated with bin Laden, at every opportunity.
Posted by Otter | August 29, 2007 9:10 AM
Casper~ ask and you shall receive!
http://www.ndp.ca/page/5183
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/out-of-afghanistan-rumblings-on-the-hill-2007-06-26.html
http://rightinaleftworld.blogspot.com/2007/06/democrats-redeploy-and-refocus-but-to.html
Posted by burt | August 29, 2007 10:40 AM
I have the strong impression that both the Taliban and Al Queda have a higher percentage of engagements which result in disasters than they did a few years ago. This would be expected to occur if the seasoned leaders and foot soldiers are dead or captured.
Posted by Duke DeLand | August 29, 2007 11:48 AM
I almost choked on my coffee this morning sitting in the waiting room of a repair shop. The CNBC report interpreted the fight as a "demonstration of the ability of the AQ to field a large force."
Seems to me that they had better bring THOUSANDS if they wish to inflict any meaningful damage upon the coalition forces. 100-1...China could not stand that ratio of losses.
An above commenter found the point. The AQ is becoming basically leaderless....They are also about out of talented fighters.
Keep the hammer down folks!
Posted by DCM | August 29, 2007 12:00 PM
Wolfwalker -
At what price do you purchase the poppy crop? The legal or illegal price? If you offer the legal price, the farmers won’t sell to you because they can get a higher price, the “illegal price”, from the illegal drug marketers. If you pay the “illegal price”, you will increase the amount of poppy crop being produced because by registering and legally selling the crop at the illegal price more farmers will grow more of the crop because its not illegal and therefore less risk in growing the crop. If you succeed in taking even some of the “illegal” poppies off of the illegal market, you will drive up the illegal price, thereby increasing the incentive to produce more poppy crops and increasing ht eprice you have to pay the farmers. Do you keep buying until no one in the world can produce anymore poppy crops to sell for the illegal price? The process will only end when the US has transferred so much wealth to the poppy growers that no one in the US has enough money to buy drugs any more. (The reason I say no one has any money left instead of the drug users is because the drug users will steal the money to buy their drugs from the non-drug users.)
Decriminalize drugs (control like liquor), let people grow them here in US, destroy the market for drug production outside US, spend 10% of the money wasted on the “War On Drugs” on drug research and education and bury those too stupid not to kill themselves taking drugs before they kill us, directly or indirectly. No other approach will ever, ever, ever work.
Posted by unclesmrgol | August 29, 2007 12:08 PM
DCM,
I had a family member on drugs. You view drugs as a victimless crime. It isn't.
Posted by Mark Collins | August 29, 2007 3:08 PM
bayam: There are around 1,200 Poles fighting with the US in eastern Afstan, along with a Romanian battalion:
Poles now operational in Afstan
"Carpathian's Hawks," the Romanian 182nd Infantry Battalion
Not bad compared to some of the other European Allies (Dutch, Danes and Estonians excepted).
Mark
Ottawa
Posted by Tim W | August 29, 2007 3:39 PM
What I always find amazing is that liberals think Afghanistan is the strategically important battle that we must win while Iraq is not. If we are going to choose to lose on one front, I would surly rather leave Afghanistan to the Taliban than leave Iraq to Al Qaeda and Iran. Iraq is at the center of the most strategically important region in the world while Afghanistan is nothing but a tribal backwater.
What even more amazing is how liberals try to tell you that there is no Al Qaeda presence in Iraq even though there is a group there that calls itself Al Qaeda in Iraq. After that bit of absurdity falls apart they go back to the "they were not there before we invaded", which while even if it’s true, is irrelevant to the current situation. Now liberals are stuck on the even more absurd line of "even though there is a group that calls itself Al Qaeda in Iraq, there not really Al Qaeda” even though Zawahiri has said multiple times that Iraq is the central front in the global jihad.
I would rather fight them in Iraq, where it’s flat than in Afghanistan which has some of the world’s most difficult terrain and is very tough to supply logistically. We need to defeat these 7th century barbarians in both places and elsewhere and if we need to pull every soldier out of Germany and Korea and redeploy them we should do it. We certainly should not be subsidizing two wealthy nations who seem particularly ungrateful for our presence.
I am sure the media in the next few days will revise its figures on Taliban dead to 90 or so innocent women and children and 10 males who may or may not be Taliban. Its sad that they always believe anything an islamic radial says and report it as fact.
Posted by Nony Mouse | August 29, 2007 4:51 PM
DCM,
There currently isn't a "legal" price for export poppy in Afghanistan. Several people have advocated to get the country on the "historical producers" list, which would allow legal purchase for medical suppliers.
Posted by Shaprshooter | August 29, 2007 7:20 PM
100 down, a bunch more to go.
Better get back to work!
Posted by Jack Okie | August 29, 2007 7:21 PM
unclesmrgol:
Many years ago, when I was still in college a wonderful uncle of mine died from the effects of prolonged drug use. In this case, his drug of choice was alcohol. I'm sorry for your family member's situation, but we all are exposed to the consequences of the choices we make. Since your family member apparently became entangled despite the "War On Drugs", how exactly are we helping anyone by criminalizing marijuana and keeping price supports on the harder stuff?