About
Captain Ed is a father and grandfather living in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota, a native Californian who moved to the North Star State because of the weather. He lives with his wife Marcia, also known as the First Mate, their two dogs, and frequently watch their granddaughter Kayla, whom Captain Ed calls The Little Admiral.
Read More
The Crows Nest
Support The Al-Dura Petition
Roger Simon at Pajamas Media is circulating a petition to demand accountability for the discredited al-Dura report from France's Channel 2. This is, as Roger calls it, the "Father of all Fauxtography," and C-2 has never acknowledged its fault in airing the supposed murder of a Palestinian child. He wants C-2 to show all of the unedited footage of the incident in order to show that C-2 faked the murder. If they're resisting the demand, I'd say they have something to hide ....
There Goes The Undefeated Season
Notre Dame managed to get its first loss out of the way as soon as possible -- and as badly as possible. Georgia Tech came to South Bend and stomped the Irish, 33-3, in the worst home opener loss in school history. The offense fumbled twice and allowed seven sacks on Evan Sharpley, who must have longed to have Brady Quinn back on the field instead. If Charlie Weis doesn't turn this debacle around fast, he may want to start asking Ty Willingham for some career counseling ....
Would Early Primaries Allow More Donations?
Jim Geraghty at The Campaign Spot believes that candidates will benefit if primaries and caucuses get pushed into 2007. A loophole in campaign finance regulation appears to allow an extra $2,300 per donor for candidates if those elections are held this year. Be sure to check out Jim's analysis, and the surprising candidate that may benefit the most.
When Tom Met Jeralyn
One of the interesting aspects of politics is finding out that opponents are people, too. Jeralyn Merritt of TalkLeft met Rep. Tom Tancredo backstage at NBC's studios, and found him more likable than she had anticipated. Perhaps it was their mutual interest in Dog, The Bounty Hunter ...
Joe Lieberman A Right-Wing Nut?
That's what CAIR says, according to Joe Kaufman. He has a link to a CAIR official's blog post that calls Lieberman, along with John Bolton, former CIA director James Woolsey, and the Heritage Foundation's Peter Brookes as "extremists". Affad Shaikh also calls Dick Cheney a "fat bastard of a liar," apparently not meant as a pop-culture reference to the Austin Powers movies. (via Let Freedom Ring)
Broadband Homelessness
The Japanese have made homelessness more efficient, and more Net-friendly, too. Their Internet cafés have become homeless shelters for the struggling manual-labor sector. The problem has grown into such a problem that government intervention will shortly become a political priority.
Found My Law Firm
Power Line links twice to this story regarding an attorney at Faegre & Benson who refused to become a victim and helped capture a very dangerous man. Keith Radtke is a partner in the firm as is Power Line's John Hinderaker. Radtke is listed in satisfactory condition after getting shot in the back, but that didn't keep him from locking up his attacker in a wrestling grip until police could arrive. I don't know about you, but that's the kind of man I'd want as my counsel ....
Don't Click That YouTube E-mail
The latest in spam seems to be redirections from YouTube links in e-mail to IP addresses without domain names. They attempt to entice people by making it seem that they have been inadvertently YouTubed. I'm sure most people can see through this scam, but just in case, you've been warned ....
Rick Moran Escapes The Floods
Rick Moran has kept us up to date on his travails along the Algonquin River. Yesterday, the police showed up to get him evacuated before the river flooded his home -- but today, Rick finds that a minor miracle has taken place, and that his house survives ... at least for now. Keep Rick in your prayers, and keep checking in at Right Wing Nut House for updates.
Rule 1: Drag The Corpse On Over First
If I've learned anything in four years of blogging, don't try to be out in front of the death rumors, especially with the villains of the world. Saddam died a hundred deaths before we caught him alive in his spider hole, and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi almost as many before his demise last year. Osama may or may not be alive, but everyone's avoided speculating on his fate for a while now. Maybe Val at Babalu Blog will get luckier with his "Castro Is Dead" story. We all hope so. I'll wait for the announcement ....
Hobbs Choice
Volunteer Voters is holding its annual "Best of Nashville" on-line polls, and one of the categories is for the best political writer. Our friend Bill Hobbs, now posting at Newsbusters, and he'd like his on-line fans to cast their votes. Drop by and put one in for Bill if you get a chance!
Murtha Getting Backlogged On Apologies
Gary Gross of Let Freedom Ring sees another case collapsing on the Haditha charges. He's called for Murtha to apologize earlier, and adds another reason to the tally.
No Such Thing As 'Moderate' Islam?
Turkish PM Tayyip Erdogan told a television interviewer that he finds the label "moderate Islam" offensive. Shrink Wrapped has a lot more on this, but at least in the same interview Erdogan acknowledged that "radical Islam" exists, and that it's been a catastrophe. Be sure to read the whole post.
MS-NBC Gets Punk'd
Power Line has a great post on a lack of journalistic effort on the part of MS-NBC. In covering the Michael Vick story, they reported on what they thought was Al Sharpton's website proclaiming Vick's innocence. I guess Alex Johnson and two other MS-NBC reporters couldn't bother to read the title bar of the site, which proudly proclaims it as a "parody site".
New Instapundit Podcast On Pharmaceuticals
I just caught this e-mail from Glenn Reynolds about his new podcast with Richard Epstein, the author of Overdose: How Excessive Government Regulation Stifles Pharmaceutical Innovation. Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but the topic is important enough to make sure I carve out time for it tomorrow. Get their first and tell me what I'm missing ....
Comments (27)
Posted by Cybrludite | September 6, 2007 7:06 AM
Perhaps to make Ahmadinnerjacket a bit more nervous?
Posted by skydaddy | September 6, 2007 7:54 AM
Training for the strike on Iran. Testing the waters, as it were.
Posted by dave | September 6, 2007 7:59 AM
"...they can't hit two planes flying in an isolated mission over their territory..."
This may have happened in a matter of minutes. Syria did not hit the military planes, but at least they did something. Flight 77, a commercial airliner piloted by amateurs, flew around for 40 minutes and the US was unable to do anything about it.
Posted by John Steele | September 6, 2007 8:15 AM
"...Flight 77, a commercial airliner piloted by amateurs, flew around for 40 minutes and the US was unable to do anything about it."
A) In general the US does not arbitrarily open fire on civilian aircraft without clear provocation. B) There is a big difference between 'unable' and 'unwilling.' C) Cheap shot, unless of course you actually beleive that Syria and the US are moral equivilents.
Posted by Kim | September 6, 2007 8:39 AM
skydaddy
You are so right. The IDF has been training for many. many months for the mission to Iran. Shhh..don't tell anybody. LOL
Posted by dave | September 6, 2007 8:47 AM
John Steele:
“In general the US does not arbitrarily open fire on civilian aircraft without clear provocation.”
When multiple planes are hijacked, and two of them crash into major buildings, I call that a clear provocation. What do you call it? What more do you need to label something a "clear provocation"? Instead of firing on Flight 77, did we just want to “talk them down” instead of firing on it? Did we think they would change their mind?
“unless of course you actually beleive that Syria and the US are moral equivilents.”
I do not believe there is a moral equivalence between the US and Syria. The US is obviously a rogue state, and a morale equivalent does not exist outside of Israel.
Posted by Emperor Alexius | September 6, 2007 9:13 AM
Dave:
Thanks for providing us insight into the radical islamist's of view.
Elif air ab dinikh !
Posted by Cletus | September 6, 2007 9:35 AM
FYI, Isreal and Turkey have in the past had an agreement that Isreali aircraft could train in Turkish airspace, because Isreal simply doesn't have enough room for certain types of training. I don't know if this is still in effect, but it has been the case before.
Posted by unclesmrgol | September 6, 2007 10:30 AM
Dave said,
Rogue: a deceitful and unreliable scoundrel.
Dave may have something here -- look at what we did in Vietnam.
Posted by dave | September 6, 2007 10:34 AM
unclesmrgol:
That's really cool how you put that bar in front of my quote. How did you do that?
Posted by Ripper | September 6, 2007 10:40 AM
I would not believe anything the Syrians and their leader, the Chinless Opthamologist say. They can give George Costanza lessons in lying.
Posted by Ripper | September 6, 2007 11:01 AM
The Corner summarizes the non event best
Drudge has affixed his police siren to this Jerusalem Post story, which details Syrian claims that Israeli warplanes entered Syrian airspace last night, dropped unspecified munitions on unspecified targets, and were chased out by anti-aircraft fire. The Israeli response, at least the public one, has been the expression of befuddlement at the claims. Little is known about this story right now — it could be true, it might be partially true, or it might be a total fabrication on the part of the Syrians, who do not have what one could call a reputation for honesty in these matters. My IDF contacts said they knew nothing of the incident. The long and short of it is that the people who know what did or did not happen aren't speaking publicly about it. Given the tensions on the Israeli-Syrian border over the summer, this incident is cause for concern, but I'm skeptical that it deserves full-hype treatment at the moment.
Posted by NahnCee | September 6, 2007 11:12 AM
Posted by dave | September 6, 2007 10:34 AM
unclesmrgol:
That's really cool how you put that bar in front of my quote. How did you do that?
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. And with dave, we're can be certain that it's very little knowledge.
Posted by NahnCee | September 6, 2007 11:17 AM
Dave, I wonder if you could tell me whether you think up these scenario's all by your little self, or if you go to the fever swamps inhabited by moonbats escaped from the mother ship to see what the latest spin is, and then scurry to this blog to repeat them?
Posted by Dan | September 6, 2007 11:35 AM
"Cheap shot, unless of course you actually beleive that Syria and the US are moral equivilents."
Syria, like the US, understands one of the hallmarks of international law is that every nation has the right to self defense. If these overflights happened, then at the very least they're an act of aggression.
Posted by filistro | September 6, 2007 11:35 AM
I, too, would very much like to know how you put that little bar beside a quote.
Posted by Mark F. | September 6, 2007 11:55 AM
little dave, the terrorists on 9/11 disabled the transponders on the planes. With our extremely crowded airspace, just how was anyone supposed to determine, quickly, where they were? Syrian airspace is pretty empty, and they are on a conventional war footing at all times. The situations aren't remotely comparable.
Posted by Gus | September 6, 2007 1:52 PM
It is very logical that this could have been an IAF surveillance flight over northern Syrian military targets. It is not uncommon for the IAF to overfly Syria when doing recon. This time, they may have been fired on and spit their fuel tanks to egress faster (which would account for the dropped equipment).
Posted by dave | September 6, 2007 1:57 PM
Mark F:
"little dave, the terrorists on 9/11 disabled the transponders on the planes. With our extremely crowded airspace, just how was anyone supposed to determine, quickly, where they were?"
So all another country has to do is not have transponders on their mililtary planes and they're free to attack? That's scary. I thought we had radar as well. 40 minutes is a lot longer than quickly.
Posted by dave | September 6, 2007 2:18 PM
unclesmrgol:
Please tell me your secret
Posted by dave | September 6, 2007 4:03 PM
unclesmrgol
Hooray!!!!filistro:
View the web page as "source" and look at the HTML tag he used. It is just "blockquote" in brackets. I guess you have to do it manualy...
Posted by Achillea | September 6, 2007 4:41 PM
Posted by Tom W. | September 6, 2007 4:52 PM
The U.S. is criticized because on a day of unprecedented confusion and tragedy, the armed forces didn't immediately shoot down a commercial airliner.
But Syria--a nation which murders Lebanese politicians and civlians with impunity, oppresses its own citizens, and sends suicide bombers into Iraq to murder Iraqi civilians by the thousands--is admired for how quickly it reacted to an alleged Israeli incursion.
Liberalism is truly a mental illness.
Posted by Mark F. | September 6, 2007 5:52 PM
little dave, you exhibit monumental ignorance in the area of air traffic control, the high density of commercial airliners in commercial flight corridors, the similarity of radar image between commercial jets, versus military ones, the heavily monitored vectors enemy aircraft would take, and the number of fighter aircraft that are ready to scramble in case of an emergency. We don't have hundreds of trigger-happy jet jockeys shadowing almost every airliner in the country, just waiting for a chance to shoot something down. Forty minutes is nothing when the task is to get a couple of pilots out of the ready room, into their fighters, take off, then try to sort out the hijacked airliners from the rest, all traveling in busy corridors. You also have to remember that no one knew where AA 77 was heading, what the target was.
Posted by dave | September 6, 2007 8:44 PM
Achillea:
Posted by Ripper | September 7, 2007 8:25 AM
Dan
"Syria, like the US, understands one of the hallmarks of international law is that every nation has the right to self defense. If these overflights happened, then at the very least they're an act of aggression."
Since when does Syria (a brutal fascist police state that kills Lebanese politicians and tortures its own people) have any regard for international law?
Posted by Dave80 | September 7, 2007 4:10 PM
Dan:
"Since when does Syria (a brutal fascist police state that kills Lebanese politicians and tortures its own people) have any regard for international law?"
When it suits their case, of course. Just as with CAIR and free speech here in the US.