December 9, 2007

Pelosi Briefed On Waterboarding In 2002, No Objections

The CIA briefed four Congressional leaders, including Nancy Pelosi, on the controversial practice of waterboarding over five years ago. Not only did no one object to the practice during the September 2002 briefing, but one attendee asked the briefer whether the technique was tough enough:

In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA program designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in U.S. custody. For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), was given a virtual tour of the CIA's overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk.

Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder, two U.S. officials said.

"The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough," said a U.S. official who witnessed the exchange.

Congressional leaders from both parties would later seize on waterboarding as a symbol of the worst excesses of the Bush administration's counterterrorism effort. The CIA last week admitted that videotape of an interrogation of one of the waterboarded detainees was destroyed in 2005 against the advice of Justice Department and White House officials, provoking allegations that its actions were illegal and the destruction was a coverup.

Yet long before "waterboarding" entered the public discourse, the CIA gave key legislative overseers about 30 private briefings, some of which included descriptions of that technique and other harsh interrogation methods, according to interviews with multiple U.S. officials with firsthand knowledge.

This puts a completely different light on the controversy. While Democrats -- and a few Republicans -- in both chambers of Congress have railed against the White House for supposed torture, in reality Congress willingly supported the procedure in over two dozen briefings. Only one person raised any objection during two years of using the procedure.

That doesn't settle the question as to whether waterboarding constitutes torture, but it certainly calls into question the notion that politics has nothing to do with the debate. The CIA stopped using waterboarding after 2003, and apparently have only used it on three detainees: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Abu Zubaydah, and an unidentified al-Qaeda prisoner. Only well after the practice had been abandoned did Congress raise objections to its use, and then never acknowledging their own acquiescence to it earlier. That lack of honesty allowed them to paint themselves as shocked, shocked! that waterboarding had been used as an interrogation technique.

Given that the CIA ended the practice at about the time that one member of Congress in 30 briefings complained about it, I'd call this a wash in terms of responsibility. The reason the CIA briefs the selected few on highly classified covert matters is not to get a rubber stamp on their activities, but to allow oversight and get approval for their covert activities. If Congress couldn't find it objectionable when waterboarding was employed, they have little to complain about years afterward.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/tabhartas.cgi/16251

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pelosi Briefed On Waterboarding In 2002, No Objections:

» Tell me again why they should be trusted with national security? from Pundit Review
When told the facts and implications away from the spotlight, the Democrats had no problem with waterboarding as an interrigation technique. When the media lights went on, it instantly became torture. Democrats wonder why people don’t trust them... [Read More]

» Democrats on waterboarding, then versus now from Sister Toldjah
Fresh on the heels of finding out that ranking Democrats knew of the CIA’s videotaping of aggressive interrogation techniques of suspected terrorists, and the later destruction of two of those tapes - all the while doing nothing about it, anti-Bu... [Read More]

» They were for waterboarding before they were against it from The Unalienable Right
The Washington Post reports today, leading Democrats were briefed back in September 2002 about the CIA's interrogation program, including waterboarding, and raised no objections then. In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a fir... [Read More]

» Hypocrisy watch from Public Secrets: from the files of the Irishspy
This is a day for hypocrites, isn't it? First it's Mike Huckabee and his attempts to play on anti-Mormon bigotry in Iowa, and then The Washington Post tells us that leading members of Congress, including now-Speaker Nancy Pelosi, knew about [Read More]

» Dems supported waterboarding in 2002? from The Anchoress
While I was away this story was all over the net, but I think I like Ed Morrissey’s take on it and the insightful comments of his readers, the best. Do take a second to read them. What I am wondering, and I’m surprised that I see anyone as... [Read More]

Comments